We provide support in strengthening ALM process:
Our expertise: More than 5 years experience in ALM process and Solvency II principles based risk reporting, including quantification of various risks.
Report within 24 hours
Detailed report and resolve all audit queries
Reports within very reasonable fees
Peer review is undertaken as per APS4 issued by Institute of Actuaries of India to independently review the valuation process:
Our expertise:More than a decade relevant experience, fulfills Life CoP requirements and acted as Life-Peer Reviewer.
Audit always gives comfort and confidence in the process. We have expertise to independently review the following actuarial processes:
Our expertise: We have advantage of work experience in core insurance companies which can help in more comprehensive and meaningful audit. We have done similar projects.
We provide support in following areas:
Our expertise : Actual regulatory working experience of F&U at IRDAI level, review of F&U at company level, review of cash flow matching of products as per F&U, IRDAI regulations compliance undertaken in Life Insurance Company.
Documents are valuable sources of reference, for sharing knowledge with both internal and external stakeholders, such as management, new staff, colleagues in different departments, regulators, rating agencies and independent validators. These provide evidence of strong processes and hence reduce the chances of errors.
Our expertise : We can help to strengthen your processes by appropriate and detailed process write ups. These can be but not limited to ALM policy, PAR business management, reserving manual, pricing process etc.
We can provide support in the following areas:
Our expertise: Working experience of reinsurance treaties management, implementation of Reinsurance systems like RENOVA, filing of LR forms to IRDAI, credit of reinsurance arrangement in Solvency Calculations.
The Gratuity Act 1972, describes that the gratuity is payable to an employee after completing 5 years of vesting period in case of resignation, termination or retirement. However, the provision shall be done as per the accounting standard even if the Company has not completed 5 years of operations. As per Para 72 of Ind AS 19/ Para 70 of AS 15, Gratuity Provision shall be made even for service of less than 5 years.
Payment of Gratuity Act applies to your company if you have more than 10 employees. All companies having 10+Employees need to make Provision for Gratuity as per Actuarial Valuation method Projected Unit credit method (PUCM) to comply with AS15/ Ind AS19.
No, the actuarial valuation is not required for short-term benefits. In case, the benefit paid after 12 months, the actuarial valuation is needed as per AS 15 R / IND AS 19 accounting standard.
For SMC, the actuarial valuation is required but detailed disclosures are exempted.
Para 78 of AS 15 states that the rate used to discount post-employment benefit obligations (both funded and unfunded) should be determined by reference to market yields at the balance sheet date on government bonds. Similarly, IND AS 19 also prescribe to refer government bond yield to set discount rate. In order to set the discount rate, its critical to keep currency and term of the bonds to be consistent with liability duration.
In India, currently there are no regulations to keep fund to back the gratuity provision calculated by an Actuary. However, it is always encouraged to keep fund in order to pay off liabilities on time and to avoid/reduce interest rate and reinvestment risk. Further, there are tax advantages for funding.
There are three key factors which shall be considered to set attrition assumption: a) Company’s recent attrition experience in last 2-3 years b) Industry experience of employee attrition c) Management view on future attrition.
Even if the plan is funded and managed by an Insurance Company, still the Company need to get a separate actuarial valuation done. The reason being that an insurance company does not provide complete disclosures as required by accounting standard regulations and sometimes the assumptions are not fair and inconsistent with Company’s own experience.